Seven Letters To Attorneys

"Third Letter To Attorneys"

November 5, 2007


re: Susan Smith and insurance fraud case


Dear Sirs,

These are more letters that provide evidence of foul play concerning the homeless community here. This first one I wrote to the Mayor of Portland, as well as various city and state offices. I believe I sent this both to the state legislature, as well as to other U.S. cities and police stations. Nobody has done anything.

Sincerely,

Susan F. Smith
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

January 17, 2007

To Whom It May Concern,

Below you will find a letter I am sending to Portland Mayor Jim Cohen, Portland City Council, and others, concerning the decision to open up a new women's shelter here. This shelter would be both unhealthy and extremely unsafe. I have made my argument below, concerning the danger of this new shelter.

If there is anything you can do to stop the opening of this new shelter, it would be greatly appreciated. Ultimately, I would like to see a court injunction against the shelter, and an inquiry into the motives behind it, and the possible embezzlement of city and federal funds for the project.

Thank-you very much.

Sincerely,

Susan F. Smith

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Honorable Mayor Cohen,

I am requesting that you seriously reconsider your decision to begin a brand new women's shelter. You will be putting the women who move there into jeapordy. We will be targets for the thugs who are terrorizing this community. There is no real need for a women's shelter in this community, and funds would be much better spent if you would just use money for overflow space for the men, if it ever becomes necessary. I believe that the funds for this project have been illegally procured, and the motives behind this new shelter are of criminal intent.

At Preble Street, we will be isolated as females. We will also be isolated from any staff outside of those who are assigned to work at Preble Street, so there will be no system of accountability with other staff and supervisors. The best choice for all concerned would be to allow the women to stay at Oxford Street Shelter as they have been, where there are men around, more staff, and male staff, whose presence will naturally put a curb on any violence that erupts.

If there is any overcrowding, all that needs to be done is expand the women's space to the first floor and the dayroom. This was the practice several years ago when there were a lot of women and when the shelter was under the directorship of Peter Murdoch. Everyone was fine with this arrangement. Money would be much better spent doing this, than opening up a dangerous and unhealthy shelter, where the women would be segregated from the men in this manner.

This is a violent community, and the people who are behind this move for the women are at the center of the violence. These women are not just thugs, they are known to have committed murder and rape. The local authorities are unwilling to take any action against them.

The police department knows how violent these people are, who are behind this move to isolate the women in this way. Staff knows how violent the people are, because these people have stayed many times over the years at the shelter. And both the staff, and the director, and the police department know that these same violent women are behind this move over to Preble Street. Simply not taking into consideration the danger involved in this move shows criminal negligence on the part of the shelter administration.

There is no reason to set-up a different shelter for the women. There are no special "women's issues" that need to be addressed in this way, or any way. The "women's issues" concept is a fabrication to segregate the genders and to create a culture of homosexuality and same-sex identity. Gender segregation is very unhealthy. The real danger that women need to watch out for is women raping other women, and this is what we are going to walk right into if we are moved over there and isolated in this way. Men raping women is very little danger compared to homosexual rape. The danger of men raping women in this community is non-existent. Apparently, however, for at least some of the staff who will be working at this new shelter, homosexual rape is fine - it's the men we need to be looking out for. Homosexual rape leads to slavery, which is the ultimate goal of the thugs.

This isolation of the women is only one of the problems. Neither Oxford Street staff, nor Preble Street staff, have a great track record of being concerned about keeping a curb on violence, nor of attempting to handle the overcrowding in a healthier and more appropriate manner.

Neither Preble Street staff nor Oxford Street staff has made much of an effort to move out in an expedient manner people who are getting government subsidy checks, a fact which has been one of the main reasons for the over crowding in the first place. A large number of people at the shelter receive monthly subsidy checks, which they promptly spend on motel rooms and drugs, returning to the shelter after their money is gone. This is an event all have been witness to at the first of every month, when suddenly the numbers at the shelter and soup kitchen drop lower than normal. Instead of dealing more appropriately with this issue, the shelter staff has allowed the numbers to swell, precipitating an artificial crisis to demand even more money from the city to separate out the women, and put them at the mercy of the violent ones.

Negligence in accountability can already be seen on the part of Preble Street staff, in their refusal to invite the Portland Police to have a squad car present in the evening during supper. The presence of the police at the Oxford Street Shelter has become standard during the evening hours, and it seems to have worked well in keeping down loudness and violence. At the soup kitchen there have been a number of fights, and people have been wounded over there during this time. One woman was dragged across the street on her face during a fight, and her arm was broken. Nearly every night there is a huge crowd of young people and thugs gathered to sell drugs and harass. Even the soup kitchen staff requested a patrol man for this very reason, but the Preble Street staff refused to do it, claiming a police presence would violate the people's "individual rights".

What kind of attitude does this display, for the very people who are assuming responsibility for a woman's shelter?

A woman named Amanda, a Preble Street staff, will be one of the new shelter staff . Amanda was present in the soup kitchen one morning when a man threw a knife at my back, and I yelled and yelled, and nobody did anything to address what had happened. I have no doubt that I yelled loud enough for her to hear. Nothing was done until someone else got into it with the man, and then the staff came over to stop the fight. I confronted Amanda a little bit later, and she made an expression of false remorse, and told me she was sorry about what had happened. She obviously knew, and didn't do anything about it.

What is Amanda going to do at the new shelter to keep the residents safe?

We also have a few staff who seem to be wanting to be deceptive about this new shelter. One staff person, named Pat, apparently is not telling people that she is going to be a part of the new shelter, although according to sources, she is planning to be a part of it.

Pat has already displayed an extremely bad record in her behavior with the shelter residents. Although Pat apparently is denying that she is planning to be staff at the new shelter, I understand it that a few people at Preble Street, and maybe one at Oxford Street, can confirm what I have said. This effort to obscure her intentions raises suspicion from the start. Pat has shown very little accountabiltiy or integrity regarding the welfare of the shelter clients. I have a few stories below illustrating Pat's lack of accountability.

About a year ago, Pat falsely accused me of being a part of an incident that never happened, which put me out of the shelter for six nights. She even made up details of the incident, saying I said things, and even describing the quality of the words. I told her and Josh repeatedly that I didn't do any such thing, and told Josh she was lying. Josh and Pat tried to keep me even from getting witnesses to come to my defense, and told me that I couldn't even leave Josh's office or go into the dorm, until I had signed a note that essentially implicated me in the incident. Instead of signing anything, I ended up just leaving and spending a night on the street with nowhere to go. The next few nights I spent in a drunk shelter, only because they had enough room at that particular time.

Even after it had become increasingly apparent that not only had I not been involved in any incident, there had not even been an incident, Josh refused to back down, and refused to stop accusing me of having been involved in something. There was no reprimand for Pat, even for lying to the supervisor, and she was right back on duty several nights later, as usual. Josh's reason for not backing down was that Pat was a staff person, and so he believed her story instead of mine, even when the principal person was saying it didn't happen, and the circumstances made it very apparent that the event couldn't have happened.

How safe would I be, with Pat as staff in such an isolated place as Preble Street? Also, what kind of intentions and integrity is Josh displaying in such criminal negligence, in refusing to back down in a lie, to the point of putting someone out on the street with nowhere to go? This kind of behavior they displayed in this incident is insane, yet these people are behind this move to open up a segregated women's shelter.

I have several more stories below concerning Josh and Pat, that display malice and their lack of accountability regarding the welfare of clients.

About a year and a half ago, Pat and Josh helped to instigate a capricious rule that we couldn't use our own personal blankets on the mats. This was a totally unnecessary rule that came out of the clear blue. They created this rule exactly a day after one of the female residents looked at my blankets one evening, and asked me why I needed so many. I told her if my legs got cold, they started hurting from poor circulation. The next night staff made the announcement that we couldn't have our own blankets, effective immediately. They claimed personal blankets were a health concern. On top of this, we were to be allowed only a few blankets each. Thankfully, I made a loud enough complaint, and was still able to get as many blankets as I needed to keep my legs warm. Otherwise, the blankets they were going to allow us would have been very insufficient, and I would have ended up with sharp pains in my legs.

This event is one of a number that have shown the willful cruelty on the part of the staff, and their acquiescence to the demands of specific clients. Pat would have no capacity to say no to the people of violence, if they decide to take it upon themselves to start roughing up the women over there, which I'm sure they are planning to do. In fact, I truly believe that Pat would be a willing cooperator in whatever violences are planned for.

The staff also has shown an unwillingness to respect orders from higher ups, which is an endangerment to the clients. One example of this, can also be seen in the events surrounding the bogus "no personal blankets" rule. The rule that was handed-down after the personal blankets were removed, and after I made a complaint about it, was that everyone had the right to have as many shelter blankets as they needed. This rule was spoken outloud. On their own whim, the staff suddenly transformed this mandate into a new rule that people could only get a maximum of three blankets, unless they got a doctor's note and had talked to Josh, explaining why they needed more. This was not the rule handed down from the higher office.

I personally have been harassed a couple of times about the extra blankets I need every night. In total disregard of the real mandate, one evening, one of the supervisors simply refused to allow me the amount I normally used, claiming that it was written down somewhere I could only have five. He even pulled a fake document proving that he was right. More recently, another staff member got huffy when I woke up with my legs cold, and found that two blankets had been pulled off me somehow, and I requested more. Eventually he got the extra blankets, but he was rude about it. There is always the the danger that my allowance will suddenly be removed, and I highly suspect this is going to be one of the first changes over at the new shelter.

Two other incidents illustrating this problem of capricious decisions and malice happened recently with the only shower the women have down in the dayroom. This particular shower also happens to be handicapped accessible. There was an initial incident with the shower when a handicapped woman staying there demanded to be let in when I was in there. Even though I was still getting dressed, Pat took it upon herself to unlock the door and force it open, demanding that I leave immediately so the handicapped woman could use the bathroom. This occurred in spite of the fact that this was the only accessible shower the women had for most of our time there.

That very same morning, within just a few minutes after this first incident, Dennis, a shelter supervisor, said a few words about restricting that particular shower altogether except to the people with handicaps. The access we are allowed to the other showers is extremely inadequate, as our time allowed cuts into our arriving in the evening and setting up, and our getting ready to leave in the morning. Most people don't even use them. Threatening to restrict that shower shows cruelty and ignorance.

After this first rude incident, it was agreed among the staff and spoken outloud to the people in the dayroom, that the established rule was to be first come first serve for the bathroom, even when it concerned the woman in the wheelchair. This was announced by a part time staff person named Cathy. She said this several times, so everyone could hear. Shortly after this rule had been already determined, I was nervous about Pat barging in again and I wanted to clarify the situation with Josh. Immediately, instead of simply complying with what had already been agreed on, he took it upon himself to make a new rule, saying each situation was at his discretion, and the discretion of the staff. He wouldn't even discuss the fact that the staff had already agreed on the other rule. In this way he left it permanently open for the staff to repeat exactly the same event that had happened with Pat, nullifying what had already been agreed on at a staff meeting.

The situation with the shower did happen again with another resident named Elizabeth. Even though the rule had already been agreed on, Pat did the same thing with Elizabeth when she was in the shower that she had done with me. This time, however, Pat forced Elizabeth to come out before she had even finished dressing. Shortly afterward, outside, Elizabeth had a siezure and was taken to the hospital in an ambulance.

There is another handicapped bathroom on the other side of the building, as well as a ramp, but this wasn't taken into consideration by the staff for this particular woman, apparently again due to Josh's desire to constrict the women's sleeping arrangement as much as possible. Even when women were using the laundryroom, a situation allowing immediate access to the bathroom for the woman in the wheelchair, this woman stayed in the dayroom, putting unnecessary demands of the limited facilities.

This inability to respect common decency, on top of the inability to resolve issues such as access to showers, in a more reasonable manner than pulling people out of showers and threatening to shut down the only shower we had access to for most of the time, shows the incompetence on the part of of staff to handle in a reasonable manner even simple problems, much less the more serious problems of the presence and danger of the violent people in the Portland area, who are threatening to move in on the women's shelter at Preble Street.

There was also ongoing favoritism between staff and clients, allowing certain clients special access to facilities, and favoritism in sleeping arrangements. While most of the women were forced to sleep in sequence on the first floor dorm, and for much of the time squeezed much too close together, some of the residents were allowed to sleep apart from this arrangement, with much more space and privacy. Some claimed this right for "religious reasons". Neither Pat nor Josh would discuss their reason for allowing this, claiming that it was at their discretion what to do with each client.

There was also ongoing refusal on the part of the staff to discipline certain of the clients who were chronically unruly, a situation that created fearfulness and stress into the early morning. These same residents would carry the issue of who was complaining about them out onto the street and intimidate the residents even further, to try and silence them. There has been no system of reprimand for those clients who intimidated other clients off of the shelter grounds. Some shelter residents have been beaten up once off the shelter grounds, for some disagreement that started inside the shelter. The staff claimed it was out of their hands, showing willful negligence and intent to inflict harm. Certain residents have also been favored during disagreements with other residents, to the point of criminal endangerment.

Below I will offer still another story of criminal negligence and criminal endangerment on the part of staff, which illustrates the seriousness of their irresponsibility in making appropriate decisions for the well-being of the clients.

A year ago, a group of girls took up residence at the shelter, seemingly with the intention to harass the residents with noise, belligerence, and eventually violence. Each night they made noise until midnight or later. The staff refused to reprimand them. It became apparent that other residents were intimidated by these girls, as the residents who have been assertive at other times kept very quiet and refused to complain while the girls kept making noise. I complained a few times, but I noticed the staff did very little to quiet them down.

The girls would play little games with the staff, denying they were talking or making noise. They would stay quiet for a minute after staff had come in, and then start up again. I was the only person in the dorm who was willing to complain about them, and they were playing games with me. The situation made it difficult for me, as I was forced to keep getting up to get staff while everyone else stayed silent. On top of this, at least one of these women was harassing me outside of the shelter about the fact that I complained about the noise makers, calling me names and threatening me.

I figured out fairly quickly that this tactic was aimed at discouraging and intimidating anyone from making any complaint at all against them. It had to be assumed that the goal here was to incrementally bring in more serious aggressions, and eventually even violence and death, while everyone had been intimidated into silence, and no staff could do anything to stop it. This was obviously a professional job with maneuvers such as this.

Other people who make noise and get complaints brought to staff will normally get a warning, and then be told either to leave for an hour, or for the night. This simply was not done with these girls. During this time, we even had one staff person approve of the women in their noisemaking, and then tell me that they had the right to make noise. This, of course, worked to discourage complaints. For this particular staff, named Christina, I became the bad guy for complaining. We had another staff, a woman named Jo, encouraging the girls to stay up late and talk, telling them she liked doing the same thing.

Eventually, after a couple of more serious incidents, one or two of the staff took it upon themselves to try to separate the girls, but this remedy would last maybe two days, and when different staff came on, the girls would be back together making noise. Never at any time were the girls threatened to be put out on the street, as other residents would have been. Nor was much, if anything, even written in the log about the problem, so there was never any record of prior incidents to refer back to in order to bring disciplinary action against them.

One time, when I tried to complain about the noise, one of the staff, Jason, talked down to me, and insulted me for complaining and trying to reason with him about disciplinary action. When I tried to talk to Josh about the problem, asking him why more action wasn't being taken against these girls, he told me, again, as he had done with the capricious rulings, that each disciplinary action was discretionary, and was determined on the particular circumstances. As with the other capricious rulings, also, he refused to talk openly about what action he actually was taking to resolve the problem. He told me that, because the girls were young, they merited a more delicate form of disciplinary action, which, apparently, was no discipline at all, nor even having it be put on record what had happened. There appeared such collusion between these residents and the staff, that discipline simply was non-existent.

There was even a more serious event during this time. When I was in the shower one morning, some of these same girls, who had been up all night with their noise, started talking about going into the shower to hurt me. The seriousness of their talk caused enough alarm so that a couple of the residents took it upon themselves to go into the bathroom area and protect me. This threat of imminent violence against a resident was reported by one of the witnesses, apparently to three shelter staff. Normally a report like this would affect the immediate removal of the people involved. Nothing was even put on record about the threats, nor was any disciplinary action taken against any of the girls. They were right back the next night, making noise as they had been.

At this same time, someone wrote a bizarre grafitti on the bathroom door, alluding to rape and violence, and to my complaining about their noise.

Because of the stress of this ongoing threat of violence, one evening I finally lost my cool at the whole thing, and started screaming at the girls to shut up, and cursing at them. By that time I was exhausted and stressed out, because this had been going on night after night, and nobody was getting any sleep, and nobody was doing anything about the problem. I had asked one of the girls to be quiet. She had turned back to me and told me to shut up. I screamed at her. Finally, when I yelled at the top of my lungs, staff came running in, and said some things to the girls. The next night, one of the staff requested that I go to staff immediately if there was a problem, instead of taking it into my own hands. I don't know what was finally put on the log about the girls, or about me. Nothing ever was really resolved about this situation. Eventually the girls just moved on.

Recently this same event threatened to start up all over again. Some girls showed up with belligerence and noisemaking, seemingly to test the staff on their disciplinary action. Again, no staff took it upon themselves to do much of anything when the girls started making noise. One staff made only a feeble effort to get them to be quiet after I had complained. The girls argued and said it was okay for them to be making noise, and the staff allowed it.

Just before the arrival of these girls, we even had staff take it upon themselves to make noise in the area where we were sleeping, and tell the residents that they were allowed to do this, even though it was keeping people up. This was the same attitude that precipitated the events of a year ago, and it felt to me that they were working to try and make a similar event happen that they had been trying for last year. I sensed again the threat of incremental harassment and violence, and staff was going to do nothing to stop it.

These same women who are proven troublemakers, are always hovering around this same community, ready to come back in at the drop of a hat. Many of them do, coming back in for a few nights to even a few months, many times making noise and some starting trouble, then disappearing again. The threat of their returning to bring violence is always present.
What is going to happen over there, with these clients of such obviously malicious intentions? The female staff that will be working there have such limited accountability, and bad track records.

Below, I will mention a few of the smaller incidents with Pat and Josh, to further illustrate their malicious intentions.

Pat and Josh were instrumental in forcing the women to sleep too close together on the mats, by putting the mats closer together, in violation of fire code and health code. They justified this move by claiming overcrowding, while Josh refused to find funds for overflow, so the men could be relocated and the sleeping arrangements could be improved for everyone.

In another capricious move, Pat removed the chairs we used to keep our bags next to the shower. In doing this, she forced the women to be more exposed when they dried off, because they couldn't keep their clothes near them. I believe the anticipation was that the women would have to leave their bags and clothes in the hall, and so would have to walk nude from the hall to the showers, and back again. This is because the shower floor is a common floor with one drain, and so it all gets wet, and so bags left on the floor would get wet. She justified this move by claiming that the extra chairs in the shower area were a fire hazard. This rule came at the same time that the women were being squeezed together on mats two to four inches apart, which actually was a violation of the fire code, a fact that was completely disregarded by the shelter staff.

Josh was squeezing the women too close together in violation of health and fire codes, and at the same time he was refusing to open up the overflow, claiming budget constraints. Yet, during this same time he spent shelter funds on unnecessary and wasteful projects. He had an unnecessary handicapped door be put in the dayroom, whereas, before this time, people in wheelchairs had no problem coming in easily through the front door. Some people in wheelchairs still use the front door instead of the new electric door, as they find it easier to use. This new door cost thousands of dollars, while the women remained on mats crammed two to four inches apart in the dayroom.

Just last week, Josh took it upon himself to spend even more shelter money on brand new bathroom fixtures for the dayroom. I hear that these new units are costing the shelter thousands of dollars to install.

The shelter has invested in new computerized washers and driers, worth thousands of dollars, instead of standard washers and driers. Awhile back, we also had a strange acquisition of double-thickness mats, which happened after they removed the single-thickness mats. There had been a problem of people wanting two single mats instead of one, to make themselves more comfortable. The staff wouldn't allow the doubling up of single mats. In a policy turn around, however, instead of simply changing this rule and allowing the doubling up of the single mats, the staff discarded all the single mats, and bought all new double mats, apparently spending thousands of dollars on them.

Then we had the acquisition of the new blankets that accompanied the bogus no personal blankets ruling. We also have the acquisition of brand new towels with the Oxford Street Shelter logo on it, which was done, apparently, in the attempt to curb the theft of towels. Instead of allowing the new towels to taper in when the old ones disappeared, they simply tossed out all the old towels and started over again with the brand new towels. These are just little details of absurd expenditures that I have noticed, displaying a surplus of funds, while Josh insisted there wasn't sufficient funds to open up the overflow for the men.

For about two weeks, maybe less, the dayroom was a bit past capacity, while Josh still refused to open up the overflow. This situation then apparently precipitated this quest to open up a separate women's shelter, as the announcement followed on the heels of the overcrowding. Now, suddenly we find there is ample funding to pay for this new women's shelter.

What happened to the "budgetary constraints" that kept Josh from opening up overflow? Josh's reasoning for this, is that the money came from a different source than that of the shelter, as it would be in the hands of Preble Street instead of Oxford Street. As I understand it, the money for the new shelter comes from exactly the same source as the shelter, and I understand that the funding for this project was quite generous.

It appears that this same money for the women's shelter was easily accessible for overflow. It's the same money. Why didn't Josh just request funding for overflow, instead of waiting for some artificially created over-crowding of the women's area, so to justify this separate and extremely dangerous new women's shelter? If budget was such a serious issue, why was so much money spent on the handicapped door that wasn't really needed, much less the new bathroom units, deluxe computerized washers and driers with electronic soap dispensers, brand new mats, brand new towels with logos, and who knows what else?

The willingness to spend shelter funds in such an exorbitant manner suggests a surplus of money available, while Josh refused to open up overflow, or allow the women more space in their sleeping arrangements.

The behavior of staff over the year shows there is criminal negligence and possible criminal intent behind this push for the new women's shelter. At issue here in this move, is that it has been instigated in full knowledge of the presence of community thugs who murder in cold blood. At issue here, also, is that there has been a deliberate manipulation of events, including the abuse of spacing in the women's area, and the cover-up of the facts about money sources and the reasons for the shelter. Criminal and irresponsible behavior is evident in the very staff who have pushed for this new shelter, and also who will be working over there. Evidence of malice is seen also in the misuse of shelter funds for worthless projects, while real needs of the clients are left unaddressed, so to bring on a situation that justified funding for this particular project.

Evidence of criminal negligence is also seen in Josh's refusal to reprimand the staff person - Pat - who lied to his face, putting one of the residents in true jeapordy by putting the client out on the street for a night with nowhere to go. Other evidence includes the instigation of bogus, capricious rules to inflict distress and physical pain on the residents, rules that have no real justification. In addition to the capricious rules I mentioned above, there was the unnecessary overcrowding on the first floor for the women, and the rule that the shelter residents all had to sleep in sequence, instead of being able to spread out if the place wasn't full. The staff again cited some bogus health reasons for this new ordering.

Apparently, this rule of seqential sleeping arrangements was more seriously enforced in the women's dorm than the men's.

Josh claimed the money source for the new shelter wasn't Oxford Street Shelter's money, but Preble Street's, and so the issue was out of the hands of the shelter administration. As I understand it, in spite of Josh's claim otherwise, he easily could have procured the same funds for the purpose of overflow, which he should have done a long time ago. There is absolutely no reason for Josh to obscure the source and control of the funding, unless there was something connected with this situation that he is trying to hide. For some reason, Josh made an extra effort not only not to allow the overflow for men to be set -up, so to force the issue of the women's shelter, but also to obscure the intentions for its establishment.

Another shelter staff also tried to obscure the reason why a women's shelter was set-up, instead of overflow. He said the on call staff were paid extra, and therefore would be more expensive overall. This simply isn't true. This new shelter, if it is set-up, will cost much more than the opening of overflow.

This new shelter is unhealthy, unsafe, and unnecessary. In this community, with such a presence of violence and thugs, there are other much healthier options to deal with the problem of overcrowding in the shelter. First, as I have already mentioned, overflow for extra men could be established, and would require much less money than would this present project. Secondly, staff at Preble Street and Oxford Street could make a more serious effort to move out the people who have stable incomes, such as government subsidy checks. Third, if a new shelter is warranted, perhaps a second, smaller and quieter shelter for residents who are working at a stable job could be opened. Fourth, money could be invested in clean transitional rooming houses where residents could stay for awhile.

There are much more reasonable and comfortable ways to deal with the presumed overcrowding situation at Oxford Street shelter, than to isolate the women and put them at the mercy of violent people, and bad, unaccountable female staff working under the authority of Preble Street. I believe all the community would benefit greatly from a more appropriate solution to this situation.

In closing, I believe this situation is serious enough, and evidence of foul play is sufficiently present, that a court inquiry is warranted concerning the intent of the shelter in making this move, and the possiblity of embezzlement of city and Federal funds for this worthless project.

There should also be an inquiry into why the shelter allows their staff to lie point blank and falsely acccuse a resident of an incident that never happened, putting her at risk of physical harm, and nothing is done to reprimand that staff. Also, there should be an inquiry as to why reports of imminent violence were reported to three staff, and this wasn't even noted in the log to deal with appropriately.

I am requesting that every effort be made to bring a court injunction against the establishment of this shelter, until these questions are resolved in an acceptable manner.
Thank-you very much.

Sincerely,

Susan F. Smith
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


November 5, 2007

re: Susan Smith and Insurance Fraud

Dear Sirs,

This is one of several interviews I have conducted with Jews and non-Jews concerning the shadow terror. This is one of several that concern this establishment of the new women's shelter. I wanted to share this with you also, because I sent it to Governor Baldacci and a good number of state offices, including state representatives, to try and put a stop to this effort to segregate the genders in this manner. I wanted you here to get an idea of how I have cried out for help in many places, to stop this terror that is happening here in Portland. I also wanted to give you more evidence of foul play in the homeless community here. My efforts to enlist help have been vaguely fruitful, but I am still trying, and I am still here.

Sincerely,

Susan F. Smith
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

January 20, 2007

Honorable Governor Baldacci,

This is another interview I have conducted with an Israeli operative here in Portland, Maine. The purpose of the interview, again, is both to serve witness to the real dangers of opening up this new women's shelter here, as well as to serve witness to the clandestine operations and terror operating here in this community, and worldwide. Again, this interview was conducted in all earnestness, with another person who has been courageous enough to come forward with as much information as she could bring forth to help us bring a stop to this terrible catastrophe we are heading toward. Again, the interview was psychic, as in this kind of situation, all participants have been silenced from terror and this is the only manner in which information can be shared.

Denise is a youngish woman, bright, with brown hair, who invariably makes her presence known in the places she's found. She has a loud voice and a commanding personality and a very hot temper. Over the years that I have known Denise, I have seen a very sincere attempt to try and overcome her compulsions to dominate, intimidate, and terrorize. When I first met her, she was absolutely intimidating and unapproachable. Now, she is willing to come forward to cooperate, and to share this part of her story. I am certain there will be more.

I wanted to note here a detail about the funding for this new shelter. As I understand it, the money for this shelter comes out of the monies that have been set aside for the running of Oxford Street Shelter. While the Oxford Street Shelter operates under the authority of the Department of Health and Human Services of Portland, Maine, and therefore is accountable to the City of Portland to the State of Maine, Preble Resources Center is considered a private organization, and is not accountable to government authorities such as the City of Portland. This means that public money will be used for the running of an institution that has limited or no accountabilty to the state. I don't even think this is legal.

People's lives are at stake. I would appreciate, again, that every effort be made not to allow this shelter to be established, and to allow the women and everyone concerned, to stay where they are at the Oxford Street Shelter. All that needs to be done is to open up the overflow for the surplus men, as they have done before. This new shelter is being established with criminal intent, and is threatening the lives and well-being of most of the residents who will be staying there.

Thank-you for taking all of this with utmost seriousness.

Sincerely,

Susan F. Smith
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Denise.

S. What's your name?
D. I am called by the name Denise. My real name is Constance.
S. How old are you?
D. I don't want to tell my age.
S. Where are you from?
D. I'm from Israel - Tel Aviv.
S. How long have you been in the U.S.?
D. I've been here about seven years.
S. Do you have military training?
D. Yes. I have been trained in the U.S. military with Israeli commando training.
S. Why are you here in Portland?
D. (silence)

(There was a digression here that I have chosen to omit from the final draft, concerning religious beliefs, and which were not really pertinent to the subject matter. Denise also didn't feel comfortable about leaving it in.)

S. Earlier you said you were ready to testify about something mind-blowing. What was it?
D. I can't tell you. I'm getting tweaked.
S. Have there been any change in the Scripture?
D. Not important changes.
S. Are you familiar with the Protocols?
D. Yes.S. How much of it have you read?
D. All.
S. Why did you read all of it?
D. Because we are supposed to learn them by heart.
S. Why?
D. Because they are real genuine mandates from the deep on how to conquer the Goyim.
S. How do you feel about these operations?
D. I can't stand them.
S. Why do you hate them?
D. They are vicious and cruel and I don't want to do this to anyone anymore.
S. What are you doing to people?
D. I am torturing children and adults to subdue the Gentle population in Portland.
S. How is the level of Israeli presence in this community compared to other American cities?
D. I Think it's about the same overall.
S. Are there as many Israeli operatives in other American communities as there are here?
D. I don't know how many there are.
S. I want to ask you a personal question - do you have blackouts?
D. Yes.
S. Do you have memory loss?
D. Sort of. I have gaps in my conscience, as we all do.
S. Do you have times when you think you might have done something you can't remember?
D. (silence)
S. Is this embarassing to talk about?
D. No. I can't divulge anything about this.
S. Do you understand why we are doing this interview?
D. Sort of. It's to keep the shelter from happening.
S. Anything else?
D. Sort of. You are trying to find flaws in the Israeli military operations so to mess them up.
S. How many Israeli military have blackouts - could you give me an estimate?
D. Probably all have some sort of problem with memory losses.
S. I have blackouts, but they are seamed together, so the blackouts themselves do not feel like a pathology, but a condition that could clear. What kind of blackouts do Jews tend to have in comparison to this?
D. I think it's worse for us overall.
S. How so?
D. We tend not to remember details of certain events that others seem to remember easily.
S. Do events tend to sit in the shadows in your memory?
D. Yup.
S. How much of the time.
D. Most of the time they sit in partial obscurity.
S. How did you do in school?
D. I made straight A's - I got tweaked most or all of the time, so I knew the right answers to give on tests and essays, term papers I did with somone who knew what they were doing.
S. What did you major in?
D. Education.
S. Primary or secondary?
D. Both. I wanted to teach second and first grades.
S. Why this age?
D. Because they are sweet and it's fun to train the first graders in basic courses.
S. What do you know about the electric shock?
D. I know they are trying to break down your brain with electric shock and rape and torture.
S. Who's behind it?
D. Pat and a few others higher up.
S. How often are they doing this to me?
D. Maybe once a week, maybe more.
S. I sense that several people are engaged in this torture. Could you comment?
D. I can't tell you.
S. Could you explain the the components of this torture I am talking about?
D. They use electric shock against the head - right at the base at the back of the head, and hold it there for a few seconds. then they deliver a second shock at the temple above the ear, then a third at the forehead between the eyes just above the brow.
S. How do they know to do this?
D. This is standard treatment for Goyim who don't behave, for as long as I can remember.
S. Has anybody else been treated in this way.
D. No, not in the way they have done you. You stay strong, and we don't know what to do wth you. That is what I wanted to tell you. You are strong as all get out, and I think you will get your wish to have this not happen.
S. Do you know what this torture feels like?
D. No. I want you to tell people how it feels in this interview.

This electric shock treatment creates in the brain a condition that tortures the mind, through occult means. It creates a feeling of extreme sadness, chaos, rage, and confusion. It is horrible, and at times it is nearly impossible to deflect, so that a person can even stabilize. It has only been by the grace of God that I have survived some of the attacks that have stemmed from this electric shock and rape. Every time someone attacks me with the curse stemming from the electric shock, I am running the risk of breaking down completely into insanity. It truly is torture, and it is happening now at the Oxford Street Shelter, with a threat of its increase at the separate women's shelter.

S. Who else besides Pat is involved in this?
D. Shawna and a few others whose names I can't mention.
S. Shawna apparently has done another strange torture on me that involves a frozen green thing that is disgusting. Could you comment?
D. I don't want to divulge top secret information.
S. Does the green thing involve ingestion of a foul substance?
D. Absolutely, and then some. It involves putting the green thing inside the crotch to make it smell foul for days. That is why you have had trouble with odor at times.
S. Want does Shawna plan to do when I get over there?
D. She plans to kill you by raping you with barbed wire and a rock tied to a stick.
S. How many people has she raped and murdered in this way?
D. Many.
S. Do you anticipate an increase overall in violence, rape, and torture against the Gentile women once we get over there?
D. Yes. That was the plan from the beginnning, to wreak havoc on the Gentile women - and men here - by separating them out as you said, so there's no accountability between the sexes. They are on their own, and this will encourage the thugs to come in to cause harm.
S. What do you understand about the plan to separate out the elderly men now?
D. The same thing. We think that you are correct in your assessment about what they are doing. It's just like in Palestine, so they can single out the kingpin males who may be problems for the Israeli takeover.
S. Overall, would you say the women would be less safe in this new shelter?
D. I think not only is it more dangerous, it will be deadly for everyone concerned, male and female.S. I see the arrival of some of the women who had left, such as Shelly, and the red head from last year named Jess. Does this have to do wth the new shelter?
D. Yes. They are anticipating the shelter, and to move in on the straight females to tweak them when necessary, to subdue them for Yaweh.
S. Is Shawna looking forward to this move?
D. Absolutely. She commanded it and they obeyed orders.
S. Would it be easier for Shawna to attack over at this new facility, than at Oxford Street?
D. Yes. It would be much easier for her to come into Preble Street and attack the females.
S. Why?
D. Because they are in collusion.
S. Who?
D. Shawna and the staff. They will let her get away with murder over there.
S. How often has Shawna tortured me with the green thing?
D. A few times. It smells horrible and we complain about it, and she quits.
S. Who came up with the idea for the green thing?
D. She did. She made it up when she saw how bad things could get when she raped with a foul substance, and she came up with the most foul thing imaginable.
S. It's a rag filled with garbage like cum and body moisture, and it's tied around a stick made from a bone of a corpse that has rotted and smells horrible. And it's frozen, so you don't smell it until it's melted inside you.
S. Whom else has she done this to?
D. I can't say. I can say you are not the first, and won't be the last.

There has been a short part edited out here, because a certain person high up in the U.S. Government has been mentioned, and the implications of this would be dangerous for all and for me to commit to in writing here at this time.

S. What instigated this maneuver at this time?
D. You did, because you are so good with your words and your message about the deep and Israel. We felt we needed to make an effort to shut you down so you wouldn't squeak anymore about what is happening in secret.
S. Could you describe as well as possible what you mean by the deep?
D. We call the deep a place where the Jews and their minions had to make plans for their attacks against the Geniles.
S. Why is it calld the deep?
D. Because it is underground.
S. How many underground dwellings are there in Portland, in your estimate?
D. A few.
S. How large are they?
D. Quite huge. There is one right under the shelter and Preble Street that is roughly six or seven stories deep.
S. How do you get inside?
D. We take a secret passageway from ...
S. Where?
D. Somewhere and then we are there.
S. I hear there is a place where the Gentile slaves are expected to go to have sex a few times a week, especially homosexual sex. Is this true?
D. Yes.
S. Is this the same place the Jews go?
D. Sort of. It's in the same location and facility, but it's a separate space for them to fornicate, and we stay separate unless we want them for something.
S. How often are the Gentile slaves expected to do this in their room?
D. Maybe five times a week, with about three partners each time.
S. How many homosexual patners are demanded of them?
D. Maybe one in three are to be straight, and the rest homosexual.
S. And the Jews, are they expected to engage in homosexual sex in the same manner and frquency?
D. Maybe. I can't tell you because I"m embarassd to admit I'm gay.
S. Are the Jews expected to engage in sex in the same manner?
D. Sort of. We are commanded to be sexual with the Goyim - raping them or doing it with them as often as we see fit, at the minimum of three or four times a day.
S. What happens if a captive Gentile doesn't want to engage in sex in this way?
D. We rough her/him up to convince him that he wants to do it as we command.
S. What do you mean "rough him up"?
D. We run a rod down his throat into his stomach to make him barf. That tends to subdue the renegade captive.
S. How traumatic would you consider this procedure?
D. Highly traumatic, to the point that some have committed suicide just thinking of it happening to them again after the first time.
S. Would you say your goal at the Preble Street Shelter would be to subdue all the women in this manner?
D. Yes, and then some. We plan to rape all the Goyim who refuse to obey our new command at the new shelter.
S. New command?
D. Yep. We plan to take over your operations as soon as we move over there. I've got to go.
S. Thank-you for the interview.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

September 27, 2007

Dear Sirs,

This is another interview I conducted with the deep concerning the women's shelter, and providing evidence of foul play in the homeless community.

Sincerely,

Susan F. Smith
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

January 12, 2007

To Whom It May Concern,

I want to share with you an interview I conducted with someone, concerning this project of opening the new women's shelter in Portland, Maine. This interview gives us a good idea of the potential for violence that is behind this new shelter. This was a psychic interview, as, given the subject matter, this is the best and really the only manner that people can serve witness to the unspoken shadow terror that is threatening all of us.

The woman I have interviewed here was a resident of the Oxford Street Shelter for a number of months, and has been acquainted with the community for several years. This interview was conducted with complete sincerity, with the intention of bringing the truth out about events that people have been too terrorized to talk about or to confront head on.

I am scared for my life concerning this new shelter, and I hope to bring to light in this letter, and others, why my feelings are well-grounded, and why they need to be taken with utmost seriousness by the City Council and the others who are responsible for the community and the homeless shelter.

I am hoping to have some more letters following, on this same subject.

Thank-you very much for taking this into your consideration.

Sincerely,

Susan F. Smith
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Shelly.

S. What's your name?
Sh. Shelly.
S. How old are you?
Sh. 27.
S. Where are you from?
Sh. Germany.
S. Are you a Jew?
Sh. No.
S. Do you have any children?
Sh. No. S. Are you married?
Sh. Planning on it.
S. What kind of education have you had?
Sh. I've been to Hochschule, and that's it.
S. What is your relationship to the Jews?
Sh. I'm a slave.
S. How long have you been a slave?
Sh. For as long as I can remember. I was a slave when I started kindergarten, and I'm still with them today.
S. How were you a slave in kindergarten?
Sh. I was expected to be polite and obedient to my masters even at that time.
S. How did you feel about the Jews at that time?
Sh. I don't remember how I felt. I just remember I always had to obey them.
S. Did you fear them as a child?
Sh. Yes.S. Why?
Sh. Because they did bad things to me to make me behave.
S. What did they do to you to make you behave when you were a child?
Sh. They made me eat feces and vomit in a brown paper bag and held it over my head for an hour. They cut on my genitals and made them bleed. They made me urinate on myself and then made me drink it from a cup.
S. What did you want to talk about today?
Sh. I wanted to talk about this thing that is happening in the shelter. It has to do with you and what you are doing to the community at Preble Street.
S. What am I doing?
Sh. You are causing a rebellion among the Gentile slaves. They are getting angry at the Jews and their minions, and are acting up.
S. How so?
Sh. They are asking why they don't get favors like the Jews.
S. What do they hope for in the change?
Sh. They are hoping to put it to an end, to silence you once and for all. They think they have you, and then you slip out of their hands and go beserk with the truth about the deep, and then they do it again, and you slip out again. this is why they set this up, to capture you once and for all.
S. How do they plan to do this?
Sh. By raping you just so, and making you into a lesbian, and then barfing you. This is what they want to set up over there.
S. What do you know about the electric shock?
Sh. I can't divulge that information.
S. Do you know wht I am talking about?
Sh. I know a little about it. They are using a device about the size of your hand, and they place it against your forehead and it brings a shock to the brain.
S. How often does this happen?
Sh. Every few days they are doing something. Susan, they are planning to murder you over there at Preble Street. This is what I am supposed to tell you.
S. Who is telling you to say this?
Sh. He is - Tom, so you can relay it to the authoritities, City Hall, and Baldacci.
S. Who is Tom?
Sh. He is a Secret Service agent in charge of this area to keep the violence at a minimum.
S. Why doesn't he make sure it doesn't happen at all?
Sh. He can't.
S. Why?
Sh. Becaue he can't stop the Jews from attacking in this way.
S. How many people in authority at the shelter know what they are planning?
Sh. Most know that Shawna is driven to kill anyone who tries to take over her domain. This is all she has between her and insanity and death, and she will do anything to stop herself from going any further into hell.
S. How much of Shawna's testimony is correct?
Sh. Most if not all is good. I can't tell you everything because I don't know it.
S. Could you describe Shawna and this issue about dominion a bit more?
Sh. She is insane. She is violent as all get out, and the only thing that keeps her intact is this idea that she has control over the homeless community here.
S. Could you talk about the violence she has engaged in?
Sh. She has a dog she has trained to rape children in nurseries and dayschool. Without warning they sniff at the crotches of the young girls and rapes them even with their clothes on.
S. How?
Sh. It's hard to describe - the dog finds a way into the panties and dress and rapes them. They are screaming and crying and saying no, no, but she just laughs and tells them it's fun.
S. Why don't the parents do something?
Sh. They can't, 'cause they have been silenced by the Jewish authority and can't say anything.
S. How old are these children?
Sh. As young as eight months, one year, up to five, six, seven or eight.
S. What else does she do?
Sh. She tortures adults and children in dungeons, as she has described, and she murders people who get out of hand, such as yourself.
S. Can you estimate how many children she has murdered by torture and rape?Sh. Quite a few, maybe a few dozen, maybe fifty since I've been here, about 3 years.
S. How many adults has she murdered?
Sh. A few more, maybe sixty or seventy adults of all persuasions.
S. All here in Portland?
Sh. No, worldwide. She comes into a place to subdue it, and murders kingpins to keep them under wraps.
S. How do you know what she has done in other areas?
Sh. I am in charge of liasons between Israel and American slaves.
S. Does Tom know how violent Shawna is?
Sh. Yes, but he can't do anything about it.
S. Does the police department know how violent she it?
Sh. Yes, but they have been subdued for Israel.
S. Does the police department know Shawna's plans to kill me?
Sh. Yes, but they can't do anything about it.
S. Why hasn't Shawna murdered me before now?
Sh. I don't know.
S. What difference does it make if the women are moved over to Preble Street?
Sh. It makes a big difference, in terms of who is in charge of the coming and going inside the building. The Preble Street people will be in charge over there, and they are not as concerned about what is happening to the clients. They are Jews and they mean business in their determination to kill Yaweh and her people.
S. What people?
Sh. Those who are around now to support you through this.
S. Amanda was there last night to talk about this big move. I remember an incident maybe 10 months ago, when a man threw a knife at my back, and she didn't do anything about it. Could you comment on this?
Sh. She's a yid who is acting like a goy to get the goyim to trust her. She wants the same thing all the other yids want, which is to destroy the Kingdom of God and set-up hell on earth.
S. Is she planning to be one of the new evening staff there?
Sh. I think it's likely she will be there for a visit, or to stay the night.
S. The other Preble street staff there last night, the man - what's his relationship with Max?
Sh. I don't know.
S. I'm going to ask again to clarify - who all is aware of how violent Shawna is, and her intentions?
Sh. Everyone in this community has a good sense of what Shawna is about.
S. How much influence does Shawna have in the decisions of the shelter and Preble Street?
Sh. They all go through Shawna and her minions.
S. Would you say then that she was behind this idea to move the women over to Preble Street?Sh. Absolutely.
S. And would you say that the staff at the shelter and at Preble Street was aware that Shawna was behind it?
Sh. Absolutely. They even remarked on how Shawna was telling them to do this.
S. And did the Portland Police Department know about Shawna's influence in this change?
Sh. Yes.